Beautiful world, where are you?

Reflections. © Charles Thibo

This quartet feels like a good-bye, and I would like to dedicate the post to a certain priest that played a substantial part in the posts of my fellow blogger readonmydear. He has left Ireland and moved on to Italy to do his duty and we, readonmydear’s readers, will miss him. String Quartet No. 13 in A minor, D.804, was written by Franz Schubert in early 1824 for two violins, viola and cello.

It is the only quartet performed in public during Schubert’s lifetime; the premiere, executed by the quartet led by the violinist and conductor Ignaz Schuppanzigh, took place in March 1824. I heard it yesterday performed by the Julia Fischer Quartett at the Philharmonie de Luxembourg. A recording by the Taneyev Quartet is available at your music store.

Reflections on Schubert’s mindset

“Pain sharpens the mind and fortifies the soul, joy however rarely has this ambition and leads to softness and frivolity”, Schubert wrote in March 1824. “My works come into being through my musical expertise and through the pain I feel; those triggered by pain alone seem to be the least popular.” Since this quartet was an instant success, pain alone could not have been the driving force, despite its melancholic mood. Schubert had been ill while he composed the quartet – once more. The writer Gernot Gruber however refuses to see here cause and effect as Schubert’s psyche and the way he worked was much more complex. Roughly at the same time, Schubert composed the Octet in F major (D.803), a work that Robert Markow, writer of programe notes for the Montreal Symphony, describes as “of genial spirit and sunny disposition”. Romantic Weltschmerz* may well have been the underlying form of pain that explains the nature of this music.

The musicologist Hans-Joachim Hinrichsen considers this quartet Schubert’s first accomplished piece of this ambitious genre. Schubert demonstrated that he mastered this challenge despite an inherent dilemma: How to reconcile Schubert’s personal hallmark of lyricism so richly exemplified by his many Lieder (songs), with the formal requirements of a string quartet valid since the times of Joseph Haydn i.e. the economy of means to structure the main and auxiliary themes and the breaking up of a musical phrase into a main voice and an accompaniment?

Mastering the quartet form

In his later quartets, Schubert would disregard these formal restrictions, but for the time being he satisfied those requirements. In the first movement he introduces the main theme, a sweeping melody inspired from his song “Gretchen am Spinnrade” (D.118), which he then exposes, develops and recapitulates in the “classical” sonata way. It gives the movement dynamic and intensity, contrasting brutally with what follows, the second movement. Here Schubert uses the shortened sonata form; the main theme, inspired by a ballet of Schubert’s incidental music “Rosamunde” (D.797), is introduced, exposed and, without an explicit development, indirectly developed in the recapitulation, in a condensed way and through the use of contrapuntal* technique. The parallels between this movement and the ballet music gave the quartet the nickname “Rosamunde” though the two have only a very small phrase in common.

The main theme of the third movement is derived from Schubert’s setting into music of the line “Schöne Welt, wo bist du?” (Beautiful world, where are you?) from a poem by Friedrich Schiller. He also uses elements of a popular dance (Ländler), joyful from its conception, but shrouded in a dark veil by the composer. The finale mirrors the formal structure of the second movement, and it is only in this allegro moderato that Schubert emerges from the overall gloomy mood of the quartet.

My feeling was that Julia Fischer’s ensemble was much more at ease with Schubert than with Ludwig van Beethoven’s Quartet No. 10 in E flat major (Op. 74) and Leos Janacek’s  Quartet No. 1, that preceded Schubert’s work. Julia Fischer appeared very tense throughout the evening which unfortunately reverberated through her performance during the first part of the concert. The violist Nils Mönkemeyer however seemed to deeply enjoy the night, and it was a pleasure to watch and hear him. The Julia Fischer Quartet performed Schubert flawlessly and the expressiveness of Schubert’s compositions always made me shiver. At the same time, this specific quartet has a number of ironic moments that easily compensate for its general gloominess. I am glad I came, because nothing beats a live performance. Despite occasional glitches.

© Charles Thibo

Published by

de Chareli

Writer, photographer, piano student, music enthusiast. And a lot more. You are welcome to follow my blog.

3 thoughts on “Beautiful world, where are you?”

  1. Schade, dass das Konzert Ihren Erwartungen nicht gerecht wurde. Das Beethoven-Quartett ist sehr, sehr schön, mich wundert dass Julia Fischer das nicht gemeistert haben soll.

    1. Ich war auch mehr überrascht als enttäuscht, aber ich hätte den zweiten Satz von Janaceks Quartett kaum wiedererkannt, obwohl ich das Stück an sich eigentluch gut kenne. Es lebt ja von seinen dissonaten Stellen und aprupten Tempi-Wechsel, aber dermaßen verzerrt, wie ich es gehört habe, hatte es nichts mit Janaceks Stück zu tun. Oder aber es lag an meinen Ohren. Ich gehe daher im Text nicht weiter darauf ein. Das Schubertsche Stück war toll, also hat sich der Konzertbesuch gelohnt. Ich liebe Schuberts Musik über alles!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *